Skip to main content

    Ownership exit economics

    Fractional aircraft depreciation

    Fractional aircraft depreciation is measured two ways, and the two answer different questions. Tax depreciation is a cost-recovery deduction, and current federal law allows 100 percent first-year depreciation for qualifying business-use property. Economic depreciation is the capital the owner does not get back. It is the difference between what the owner paid for the interest and what the owner nets at exit, after every deduction the agreement permits.

    There is no standard percentage for the economic loss. Aircraft type, holding period and market conditions affect the value at exit. The agreement’s valuation method and deduction schedule determine how that value becomes the owner’s net proceeds.

    We review the valuation clause, the deduction base and the repurchase terms before capital is committed, and model a range of possible net exit proceeds.

    Two measurements

    Tax deductions and economic loss are separate measurements

    Economic depreciation is the decline in what the asset is worth, realized when the interest leaves the program. Spread over the hours flown, any capital not recovered at exit adds to the cost of each hour, alongside fees and hourly charges. It does not appear as a recurring charge on a monthly statement.

    Tax depreciation is a statutory cost-recovery mechanism applied to qualifying business-use property. The two are computed differently and answer different questions, so an owner can take a substantial deduction in one year and still realize a substantial economic loss at exit. A tax deduction does not establish what the owner will recover at exit.

    For a fractional owner, the capital lost between entry and exit is a cost of ownership in the same way a fee is. We keep the two measurements apart in the cost model so that a deduction is never treated as a recovery of value.

    The tax question

    Eligibility for first-year tax depreciation

    Whether a particular aircraft interest qualifies for the first-year deduction depends on acquisition and placed-in-service timing, qualified business use (business rather than personal flying), the listed-property rules, documentation and the entity through which the interest is held. A sale can trigger recapture that reverses part of an earlier benefit.

    Eligibility and recapture are questions for the owner’s own tax advisor. We work alongside that advisor and model the economic depreciation of the fractional interest on its own.

    Contractual valuation

    The agreement determines how aircraft value becomes the owner’s net proceeds

    A whole-aircraft sale is negotiated on the open market. Brokers, published references and comparable transactions influence the price, and an owner can decline an offer and wait. A fractional interest has more limited exit options, governed by a contractual process with a defined counterparty, valuation method and timetable.

    The agreement narrows the available exit routes and establishes how value and deductions are determined. Two buyers holding the same size interest in the same aircraft model for the same period can net different amounts because their agreements define value and deductions differently.

    Valuation and deductions

    Valuation and deduction terms determine the amount payable

    The repurchase promise and the amount payable are covered by different provisions. The valuation clause identifies who determines fair market value and whether an independent appraiser is involved. It specifies whether one appraisal governs, several are averaged or a published guide is used, and whether the owner can contest the result.

    The agreement also defines exit deductions and early-exit adjustments; selling a fractional share explains the economics, while share transfer covers the transaction process.

    The base used to calculate a deduction affects how much is taken from the sale proceeds. It is generally the value at exit rather than the original purchase price. In a soft market, a percentage deduction further reduces proceeds from a share whose value has already fallen.

    The agreed valuation method and deduction base can materially change net proceeds. Their effect belongs in the ownership decision alongside the recurring charges.

    In a hypothetical example, a share bought for $1 million is valued at $700,000 at exit. An assumed deduction of 5 percent of that exit value is $35,000, leaving $665,000 before repayment of any loan and any tax.

    The $335,000 of purchase capital not recovered includes both the decline in value and the assumed exit deduction. These figures are not an operator's pricing, a resale forecast or a tax calculation. A different sale value or deduction changes the result.

    We assess how expected sale proceeds and the agreement's exit terms affect the cost of ownership. Speak with us about the aviation decision, with tax advice remaining with your tax advisor.

    Discuss your ownership costs

    Repurchase terms

    A guaranteed repurchase secures a buyer, and the agreement decides the price

    A guaranteed repurchase secures a buyer, a process and a timetable. In most agreements it settles at a value determined at the time of exit, less whatever the contract allows to be deducted. It provides a contractual route to exit, subject to the agreement’s conditions and the provider’s ability to perform.

    The guarantee does not protect the owner against the aircraft being worth less than it was. A guaranteed buyer can still pay less than the owner originally invested. The cost model therefore needs to allow for economic depreciation. What backs the promise, whether a parent guarantee, a fleet asset or only the manager’s balance sheet, is a question for counsel.

    Magellan Jets publishes a guaranteed buyback at 60 percent of the original share value at the end of its three-year term. Flexjet states that a portion of the share purchase can be sold back to it at the end of the contract, and NetJets states that Share liquidity is guaranteed. Where no figure is published, the agreement’s valuation method and deductions set the amount.

    The timing described in fractional share renewal affects when repurchase capital becomes available for another commitment.

    Four structures

    Who bears residual risk under each structure

    A fractional share owner holds an interest in a specific aircraft and bears the residual risk within the contract’s bounds. The agreement’s valuation method sets exit value, with deductions for remarketing, administration and condition adjustments. The time from decision to payment is the notice period plus a contractual settlement window.

    A whole-aircraft owner holds the asset outright and bears changes in its resale value directly. Exit value is negotiated on the open market with a buyer, with deductions for broker commission, pre-buy remediation and closing costs. The marketing period is often measured in months.

    A fractional lease leaves the asset and the residual risk with the lessor; the lessee faces return-condition and end-of-term charges, and the exposure ends with the lease term. A jet card gives the client no aircraft interest and therefore no aircraft residual risk. Its unused-funds, expiry and refund provisions govern the remaining balance.

    How we evaluate depreciation

    Uncertain exit proceeds affect the choice between owning and leasing

    An exit estimate is uncertain because the market and settlement date lie in the future. We assess a range of proceeds under the agreement’s valuation and deduction terms, including how an earlier exit would change the result.

    Capital not recovered at exit belongs in the ownership cost alongside the recurring fees. Its effect can change whether a purchased share or a lease is the better fit before capital is committed.

    Tax eligibility and the legal strength of a repurchase promise remain questions for the owner’s tax advisor and counsel. We keep those questions separate from the economic comparison and take no operator commissions or referral fees.

    We assess how expected sale proceeds and the agreement's exit terms affect the cost of ownership. Speak with us about the aviation decision, with tax advice remaining with your tax advisor.

    Discuss your ownership costs

    Common questions

    Frequently asked questions

    No. Tax treatment and the agreement's valuation mechanism are separate. A deduction does not alter an appraisal or contractual buyback percentage by itself, and its personal tax effect belongs with the owner's tax advisor.

    Yes. In the illustrations, net proceeds are after transaction deductions but before loan repayment and tax. An outstanding loan or applicable tax can reduce the cash retained at settlement without changing the aircraft's sale value.

    If it is calculated on exit value, its dollar amount falls with that value, while the owner's capital loss may still increase. A deduction based on the original purchase price would behave differently. The agreement specifies the base.

    Buyback descriptions reflect Magellan Jets’ fractional ownership page, read September 29, 2026, Flexjet’s fractional ownership page and NetJets’ Share page. Exit provisions are described as we read them in fractional program agreements and are stated as our own view; the executed agreement controls. Tax references are to IRC §168(k) as amended by Pub. L. 119-21 and IRC §280F, verified September 29, 2026. The qualifying-property bonus depreciation provision and Magellan’s published 60 percent buyback were checked October 8, 2026 and rechecked October 14, 2026. The separate exit illustration uses hypothetical values and deductions, with arithmetic checked October 14, 2026.

    Sources: IRS depreciation topic · Magellan fractional buyback terms

    Disclaimer.

    Prepared by Fractional Aviation Advisors. About our principals. Last updated October 2026.